Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: When a computer device upgrade really isn't an upgrade....

  1. #1
    -megalithanod
    Guest -megalithanod's Avatar

    Post

    Well, I got started on burning the CDs that need to go out to those that asked for them, and found something out.

    I recently upgraded the desktop system I had from a P3 866MHz 512M 80G HDD system to a AMD 3200+ 1G 160G HDD system.

    The previous one I had added in a CD burner and was able to burn cds at 52X (really only 48X due to media). Took me 3 minutes to burn a whole CD. It was great.

    Then the system I upgraded to had a DVD+/-RW, CD-RW drive in it. I thought cool, I can do CDs and DVDs. It was the fastest drive I could find for DVD burning, very nice system once I got my dual-monitor card in there.

    Here comes the kicker....I found out when I started burning the CDs that the best I could burn them was at 16X. What the hell is that??

    Oh well, the wife has the fastest burner now so I guess I need to coax her into helping [img]wink.gif[/img]

  2. #2
    Inactive Member thor16's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 16th, 2004
    Posts
    994
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    This has been mega's moment of technical jargon that no one else understands.

  3. #3
    Inactive Member Drau's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 5th, 2004
    Posts
    5,789
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    it's a trade-off of price for functionallity.

  4. #4
    Inactive Member baimun's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 6th, 2001
    Posts
    6,345
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Those combo drives don't burn nearly as fast as the CD-RW's. I'd move that one up to the top drive, use it as a DVD reader and occassional writer (when burning DVD's) and put a plain 48x CD-RW in the second bay. [img]smile.gif[/img]

  5. #5
    -megalithanod
    Guest -megalithanod's Avatar

    Post

    Yeah - I know that now Baimun! Actually, I knew it before, it just never crossed my mind prior to getting this system. It a 48X reader in it now and I have been looking into changing that out. The only hang up I have with switching it out as I want the drive I put in there to be able to handle the facing mounted on it that the system has. It looks sleek and I don't want to have a drive that sticks out like a sore thumb in looks on it.

    As soon as I can find one, it is going on there, don't worry about that! [img]wink.gif[/img]

    Besides, I need to add a KVM, and a couple of UPS units to the home network anyway, so adding a fast CD-RW to the order shouldn't cause too much hassle [img]smile.gif[/img]

  6. #6
    Inactive Member Peter Peeker's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 17th, 2004
    Posts
    16,859
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    at least yer burner is working...
    I've killed a pack of discs trying to make cds for people... [img]mad.gif[/img]

  7. #7
    Inactive Member AngelsDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 26th, 2004
    Posts
    1,763
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    That's the unfortunate side effect of using a DVD-RW to burn CD-R's. The technology is there of course, but with the addition of the specific codings and reading ability of the new drive, along with the higher powered laser lens, it kinda kills some of your speed in burning a regular CD (they wouldn't want to melt it). They'll get there eventually on it, as they're still working on it (Hell, I remember when cd burners first came out, and now you have DVD burners for damn close to the same price as a CD burner, and cd Burners are cheap as hell). But for the technology, you didn't get smacked too bad on the loss of speed (I mean you CAN burn dvds [img]tongue.gif[/img] )

    Hell I remember my first CD burner.. I could only burn a top speed of 8x. Now THAT'S slow.. half hour to burn a cd.

  8. #8
    -megalithanod
    Guest -megalithanod's Avatar

    Post

    Hell Angulus, I can do you one better on the first CD burner.

    My first one was SCSI only, and burned at 2X (if you were lucky). [img]wink.gif[/img]

  9. #9
    Inactive Member AngelsDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 26th, 2004
    Posts
    1,763
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Umm... Ouch?! [img]eek.gif[/img]

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •